Does this mean..

I am reading between the lines but I think what USADA is trying to say is:

Upon further review, yes your doctor is probably right and you got screwed. However, if we actually admitted you got screwed by us then you might sue us. So, if you agree to a 2 year ban, which you have already served and thereby accept the decision and give up your option to sue us then you can race again.

Maybe I am reading to much into it, but I would have sued. The test is flawed, WADA knew it was flawed and just like the current round of test controversies they are fudging the science. The EPO test had serious issues very very early on and it turned out us skeptics were right. Hey Dick, were's the apology?